Even if he wrote a few chapters with his perfumed-prose pen, the story gripped me.
Although it occurs to me, in the light of day, that we never learn why the bad guy was bad. What did he want that made him do -- well, I can't tell you what he did. That would be giving it away.
And another thing: why did Edgar -- oh, I can't tell you that either. But what Edgar did was as puzzling as me mixing up a stiff glass of chocolate milk, then dumping it down the kitchen sink. Plots have to make a little more sense than that.
Readers on Amazon mentioned the story's parallels to Hamlet. Thanks to my sub-standard education, I never picked up on this. Will I actually have to read Hamlet now? Am I supposed to plug the bad-guy motivation from there into Wroblewski's story and call it good?
Still, I congratulate the author. He kept me up until 3 a.m., didn't he? He made this night-owl out-night-owl herself. And this was a first novel, by the way.
But I think he owes us something on what drives the bad guy.
Now, having slept off my Edgar Sawtelle reading binge, I'm back to thinking about practical things, like what to fix for Sunday dessert:
Easy Apple Crisp
Next book: a Christmas story.